|
|
Dark Matter Density as a Function of the Time of Year Orvin E. Wagner
Wagner Research Laboratory
Rogue River, OR 97537
Email: oedphd@wildblue.net
ABSTRACT. Until recently I have been assuming from the data taken that the dark matter wave velocity on earth is close to 25 m/s. The density of dark matter is apparently proportional to the reciprocal of the wave velocity squared. I found the velocity for the past few months using my interchange method described in my 2010 Physics Essays' article "1/f noise and dark matter waves in trees samples and air". The data therein was taken near the first of May 2009. Recently (beginning in August 2011), the wave velocity was found near 1000 m/s, and increased to more than 20,000 m/s in October in the Northern hemisphere. These high velocities indicate very thin dark matter. Apparently one has to take into account the location and tilt of the earth in the pattern described in my 1999 Physics Essays article "Waves in Dark Matter". In this article I show the solar system is at least partially organized by dark matter standing waves from the sun. We may have to assume that that the earth lies at least partially on an antinode rather than near or on a node compared to most of the other planets. The earth's orbit location varies as a function of the time of year being closest the sun in December and farthest away in July with the tilt determining spring, summer, and winter in the Southern and Northern hemispheres My 1999 Physics Essay's article's data indicate that the earth is not on a node. At least older plants apparently require dense dark matter, especially for their early growth, (see the Wagner plant references) which would be provided by the dense dark matter of an antinode at the proper times of the year.
1. INTRODUCTION The velocity of waves in dark matter (behave similarly to sound waves) is inversely proportional to the square root of the dark matter density with the dark matter density equal to1:
d=9.75x107/v2 Gev/cm3 where v is velocity in m/s. This density was derived in my 2010 Physics Essays article[1] and compares favorably with the Frere estimate[2] for the spring dark matter density. The density varies considerably according to my measurements. It appears the tilt of the earth has a very l arge effect on the density assuming the density is similar for spring in both Northern and Southern Hemispheres of the earth. This should be the case since plants grow similarly in both Northern and Southern hemispheres and the data seems to show that at least older plants are organized by these waves (see my many plant references). Much other life may also depend on these waves. On this date (Oct 2011) the dark matter density here, as measured, is extremely small while likely the Southern hemisphere density is likely large and will remain that way for a total of near three months for Spring in the Southern Hemisphere. In the Northern hemisphere it appears to remain at near the same large density for the same amount of time in the Spring according to my measurements[1,4]. If one considers the earth's tilt, in the Spring the northern hemisphere is tilting toward the sun while in the Northern hemisphere fall, the Southern hemisphere is tilting toward the sun with both cases about the same distance from the sun and apparently in a dark matter antinode with the dark matter density large in both cases. These conditions meet the requirements for the spring organization applications of dark matter waves. Of course the antinode idea depends on the waves in dark matter theory presented in my 1999 Physics Essay's paper[3].
2. METHODS AND MATERIALS Most of the methods and materials are discussed in the reference articles[1]. The main objects used in this article for data taking are a RM564 storage oscilloscope with the proper plug ins. Salt filled wood samples with contacts in the ends are used for receivers and transmitters, as well as trees, with steel probes along the trunks[1]. The salt filled samples are mounted in grounded aluminum metal boxes to prevent noise pickup and demonstrate matter penetration[1]. A transmitting sample is pulsed electrically, through steel probes on the ends, with the receiving sample or tree connected to the scope through a low pass filter to prevent high frequency noise. After pulsing a signal bounces back and forth between samples in this article or between samples and trees. The time separation between peaks, in the received sine like curve, is proportional to the transmitter and receiver separation[1]. In the spring, when the signal amplitude is large, the early results came from a strip chart recorder that could be driven by a few millivolts. If the receiver and transmitter were close together, like 1.7 m[1], I used the storage scope because the signals were too fast for the strip chart recorder[1]. For the recent later summer and fall signals, when the signals are weak, I used an AD 620 amplifier with available gains of 1000 and 5000 for the receiving sample signal that was sent to the oscilloscope. See reference (1) for examples of the bouncing signals between trees and samples and between samples.
3. RESULTS Over the past years I have found that the velocity of the apparent dark matter waves in the spring, for about 3 months, March, April, and May has been about 25 m/s [1,4] or even smaller. Low velocities were observed first in 1988 where I chopped into trees and recorded the signal from two nearby trees, for example[4]. When I used a two-pen strip chart recorder in reference 4, I later took out the separation of the pens, for the major graph, to get a corrected result of near 25 m/s as with later data. In the early cases (late 1980's) I attempted but failed to find the transmission later in the summer likely because my strip chart recorder could not respond to the very fast low level signals (unpublished). In the 2010 Physics Essays publication I report the 25 m/s spring figure again several times[1]. Recently I found the velocity increasing radically (August 2011 and increasing into October). In this later data I used a storage oscilloscope (as I did in the first case in the 2010 publication for a receiver and transmitter close together[1]). The latest data has been very consistent in providing an increasing velocity showing that the dark matter density is apparently decreasing radically. The dark matter density in the Southern hemisphere spring is likely providing the near 25 m/s or lower velocity. Again note that the velocity of dark matter waves appears to be proportional to the reciprocal of the square root of the dark matter density giving the density of dark matter proportional to 1/(velocity)2. The latest available (within about 10% from reading the oscilloscope) 2011 data: Sept. 2; 1210 m/s, Sept. 17: 2212 m/s, Sept. 22: 2350 m/s, Oct. 8; 18,392 m/s; Oct 26; 20,600 m/s. Obviously the reciprocals of the squares of these values are so much smaller than 1/(25)2, that the velocity that could be measured is near 25 m/s on the above dates in most of the Southern hemisphere. This is true if the theory is correct. As an example of the data taken here see the graph obtained for October 8, 2011 below (Figure 1):
FIG 1. The storage scope signal, from a receiving sample, used to determine dark matter wave velocity, for October 8, 2011. This shows the signal "bouncing back and forth between two salt filled samples started by pulsing the transmitting sample with 27 volts which also triggered the scope. The sample separation was 51.5 m. The horizontal spacing is 10 milliseconds per division while the vertical is 0.01 volts per division. Taking half the time between a pair of initial upper peaks and dividing into 51.5 m gives about 18,392 m/s. All the other given velocities were determined in a similar manner. The signal from the receiving sample was amplified about 5000 times since the fall signals are so weak in comparison to the spring signals described in reference 1.
4. CONCLUSIONS AND OBSERVATIONS In the 1999 Physics Essays published a paper[3] I describe the solar cycle of the sun as an oscillation of dark matter in the sun, which causes the sun to emit dark matter waves that become standing waves in the space around the sun. These apparently tend to place and hold the planets in place and stabilize the solar system. The separation of the nodes increases as one goes away from the sun because the velocity of waves in dark matter increases as 1/ (square root of dark matter density) with the densest dark matter at the sun's surface. One might note that the solar radius in meters is equal in magnitude to the usually given solar cycle period in seconds. On the sun's surface the waves travel at 1.25 m/s as derived in the 1999 article. From the behavior of the dark matter density, as indicated by the measured velocities, it appears that the orientation of the earth provides the dense dark matter of an antinode, produced by the sun's oscillation, for about three months in the Northern Hemisphere (much of March, April, and May) and for about three months in the Southern Hemisphere when the Northern Hemisphere dark matter density is very small as mentioned earlier. The dark matter density seems to be large and constant around the equinoxes like the March equinox in the Northern hemisphere (beginning of spring) and the September equinox in the Southern hemisphere. From my measurements the dark matter density in September in the Northern hemisphere is near negligible with it still decreasing into October as indicated by the given measurements. The idea that the sun is an oscillator is backed up by the oscillating data that I observe from between salt filled samples and salt filled samples and also between trees and samples[1]. Plant oscillations that I have observed tend to suggest the same thing (see my numerous plant publications). The idea that the sun is putting out standing waves is also suggested by the data with the earth apparently on or near an antinode all the time. The standing waves that I suggest place the planets apparently are not overwhelmingly influential but they apparently serve to keep the solar system stable, which has been considered a problem since almost the beginning of modern physics. If dark matter is present, as this article suggests, then the theory is extremely simple and tends to prove my 1999 Physics Essays articles' authenticity. The given experiments are also extremely simple. The author generally will be able to demonstrate results within a few minutes if someone desires a demonstration while the equipment is set up. The samples used in the experiments need replacement at times. In the experiments here the waves discussed have been found to penetrate everything tested including my local hill. (See darkmatterwaves.com and "Evidence for local waves in dark matter" or just look up the article on Google.)
REFERENCES (1) O.E. Wagner, 1/f Noise and Dark Matter Waves in Trees, Samples, and Air, Physics Essays 23,44 (2010).
(2) J.M. Frere, F.S. Lang, and G. Vertongen, Bound on the Dark Matter Density in the Solar System from Planetary Motions, Phys. Rev. D77, 083505(2008).
(3) O.E. Wagner, Waves in Dark Matter, Physics Essays, 12,3 (1999).
(4) O.E. Wagner, W-Waves and Plant Communication, Northwest Science 62,263 (1988).
| Copyright ©1996-2011 Orvin E. Wagner |
Waves in Dark Matter